In contrast, CCD#2 is just an add-on with a medium binning category to reduce the cost of the final product, and often it is CCD#2 that we most often use as the main CCD in Ryzen 5 5600X.Īs for the technological process, it has been significantly refined. CCD#1 is always a super binned specimen, and in most cases, it is the CCD capable of conquering the 5GHz mark. Also, Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen 9 5950X processors have another interesting feature. Ryzen 9 5950X processors, in turn, have the best ratio of frequency vs. This suggests that the chips used in Ryzen 9 5900X have a better frequency to voltage ratio and such processors usually have a huge potential for overclocking. Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen 7 5800X processors have similar TDP and PPT, but have dramatically different performance. In the end, each processor has a chance of the lottery, but the processors with two CCDs have a greater chance of a performance boost. Depending on that, they will get either Ryzen 7 5800X or Ryzen 9 5900X (for example). So, there is a template of testing silicon with certain tolerances (required range) for voltages relative to certain frequencies, which will be used to select the chips. Nobody canceled the "strength" of silicon or, as some call it, "potential" because long testing of silicon in factory conditions is both additional time and additional resources, which may eventually lead to a disproportionate increase in the cost of the product. At this second, it may seem to you that everything is optimized or overclocked to you, and we, enthusiasts, have nothing else to do here, but it's not so. Now, the labeling of CPPC cores corresponded to reality, and SMU intelligently use cores with maximum energy efficiency in low threaded applications. Information about this nice architectural feature started to flicker at the time of the Cezanne codename processors announcement, although it existed already in the Renoir codename processors.Īlso, I can note that AMD managed to overcome weak single-core boost or single-core boost from cores that had mediocre silicon performance and fault tolerance. During the development of CTR, it was discovered that during the boost to all cores, each core gets its own individual portion of voltage depending on the individual silicon characteristics (FIT). To my surprise, there was no mention of active dLDO in the presentation slides at all. At the time of the release, this turned out to be a slightly different feature than the news says - individual voltage control for the cores is referred to as "Curve Optimization." I think some of you remember the news that Ryzen processors with the Zen 3 microarchitecture were given the ability to customize frequencies for cores individually. A new layout, significant architectural changes to the modules, and a more fine-tuned tech process that allows for 5GHz and sometimes even higher frequencies.Įverything the community asked for, the community finally got. In addition to all of the above, there was another event with a capital letter, which added to the pleasant worries and delayed the release of CTR 2.0: the long-awaited release of AMD processors with the Zen 3 microarchitecture. Then download the Cinebench R20 archive and extract the contents of the archive to the “CB20” folder (this folder is located inside the CTR folder).Download CTR and unpack the ZIP archive in a directory of your choice.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |